In every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts: they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty. Emerson believes that to be oneself is a virtue to all, except for the members of society who conform to others' thoughts and values without regard to their own conscience.
These independent people grow hungry for other people to depend on them. They crave the attention of everyone outside of themselves or, in other words, the dependent.
In contrast, self-reliant people are the independent beings-the virtuous, or those who do not count on In WriteWork. Franklin does meditate on his internal self, but his overall self utilization comes from how he appears to others; Emerson fully relies on himself and only himself to determine his identity.
In this case, he has eliminated any sense of pleasure, passion, or love from sexual intercourse. This virtue is a stripping sex of its emotions or artfulness and reducing it to its strict utilitarian function.
Franklin does the same to other forms of art, such as poetry. In this rigid definition of poetry there is no room for emotion, expression, or thought. Poetry only serves Franklin as a means to improve writing ability; the social importance of poetry is only the outward utility that it provides. The Emersonian perspective on art does not detach it from its utility, only its consistency. It was in his own mind that the artist sought his model. Unlike Franklin, Emerson believes that art has a purpose besides just improving an outward appearance.
When an artist creates out of an inward observation, then he is refining his process of morality and virtue. Art as a product of the soul is more practical at becoming self-reliant than art as a product of practice. Understood by Emerson, innovation comes from within, and consistency comes from mimicry of outward appearances. Franklin bases his entire interpretation of individualism on outward appearances, this is how he prescribes a path to being a self-made man. To achieve the American Dream, Franklin suggests that it is best to imitate those that have been most successful in history.
He says that he has troubles accomplishing the reality of this goal, but he always makes sure to appear as if he is imitating these moral dignitaries. Emerson would strongly disagree, he would suggest that you should imitate no one. To Emerson, imitating what has come before is the quickest way to lose yourself. Franklin wants people to adopt the virtues that he deems acceptable; Emerson wants people to adopt their own set of ethics and justice that they deem acceptable based on introspection.
If it were necessary to practice both Franklinian and Emersonian modes of attaining the American Dream, then one would be traveling in a never ending hypocritical struggle to find themselves. As a Franklinian, one finds their self utility in the society surrounding them. In the Emersonian process, one finds self actualization through a full reliance on introspection. Both systems attain a level of virtue and moral weight, but they fundamentally employ different systems of being American. Emerson focuses solely on the individual, and how to rely on that singular structure.
Emerson also talked about how people should not follow the rules not in a rebellious display in order to express individualism.
Regarding these beliefs, I side with Emerson because I believe that people should be themselves and not allow society to tell them how to act. On the. When they took money from the poor they became very wealthy so they could buy more land and expand their monasteries.
Benjamin Franklin presents clear reasons why the colonies are declaring independence, including a cause-and-effect explanation and specific offenses for evidence.
His cause is that the British government is not doing a professional job. The effect of this is that they need to secede and develop their own nation. In this draft Franklin shows how the British government has wronged the people and not met their standards. Transcendentalism was a literary and philosophical movement in a America that was looking for an identity.
The main ideas of transcendentalism are that the individual should be independent and that man is inherently good. They also thought that individuals should find God through nature. Both Emerson and Thoreau wrote about these ideas and expanded them to nature and god. Reasoning that the only purpose of the government was to protect the individual freedoms of the people it governed, Thoreau believed that it should have minimal control over their lives or better yet none at.
Traditionally, "The Enlightenment" has been associated with France, America, and Scotland rather than Britain, which, strangely enough, is thought not to have had an Enlightenment to speak of.
Porter's general concern is with "the interplay of activists, ideas, and society," and to this end he examines innovations in social, political, scientific, psychological, and theological discourse. The key figures the "enlightened thinkers" read like a Who's Who of the 17th and 18th centuries--Newton, Locke, Bernard de Mandeville, Erasmus Darwin, Priestley, Paine, Bentham, and Britain's "premier enlightenment couple" Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, as well as the men who helped popularize and disseminate their ideas, such as Addison, Steele, Defoe, Pope, and Sterne.
The book is peppered with brilliant quotes, and although it covers such vast ground in a rapid and sometimes breathless manner, Porter just about manages to hold it all together. We as individuals deserve to be treated with respect, kindness, and non-judgmental attitudes.
0コメント